While walking to Quaker Meeting one Sunday morning, I heard a familiar hymn from my childhood wafting from the open doors at St. Mary’s. About a block later, still humming along, I realized it was the Protestant hymn, “Faith of Our Fathers.”
Well, I thought it was a Protestant hymn, especially now that this music is as likely to be heard in American Catholic services as in the mainstream Protestant ones, which have been drifting toward the newer pop-influenced praise songs. (A musically literate friend, by the way, dubs the rocking chants the Rupture songs.)
Imagine my surprise in learning the hymn in question was written to commemorate the English Catholics martyred in the schism that created the Church of England!
Either way, the questions remain, Whose father? And which faith?
And, as a digression seen in genealogy, we can add that it’s often the mother’s faith that’s followed.
Still, any way you want to look at this, I think it reflects a widespread sense of an earlier “golden age” of faith. Early Quakers, for instance, insisted that they weren’t intent on reforming Christianity, but rather restoring it to a richness from “before the great darkness of apostasy that set upon the church,” something I’d deduced meant from before the first Nicene Council.
And, for balance, many later Quakers looked and still look to the upheavals of that first generation or two of the Society of Friends as a golden era of faithful devotion, something a closer reading of history will challenge.
Now that image of the early church has in turn been challenged in my reading of Richard E. Rubenstein’s When Jesus Became God, which focuses on the tribulations leading up to the Nicene Council and then flowing out of it.
The fact that both major sides in this confrontation were so violent, often as roving mobs, continues to rattle me, along with their allegiance to priests and bishops and the secular power those clergy already carried, even when Christianity itself was at odds with the Roman empire.
More subtle is the emerging schism between the Greek-speaking Christians of the eastern Mediterranean, with their complexity of thought and love of philosophical speculation, in contrast to the more action-oriented Latin-speaking Christians to the west, who lost much of the subtlety of the debate. Already, the tensions between the metropolitan bishops, or theoretically equal “popes,” of the eastern Mediterranean sea and Rome were mounting. If Rubenstein is right, the schism between the Eastern Orthodox churches and the Roman Catholics was taking shape even before the Nicene Council, no matter how later history records the tragic events.
All of this leaves me asking just when the church moved from synagogues and home-based circles into a priestly class abetted by passionate mobs in the streets.
As Rubenstein repeats, there came a point when Jews were no longer part of the discussion but were rather persecuted.
Now, let us consider. Could that be when “the dark night of apostasy” arose?
Jnana's Red Barn 
I think Rubenstein has a point. The language difference between East and West created division much earlier than it was formalised.
I think, too, that there are other complexities. When worship was still in the home, it was always the wealthiest members (with the largest homes) who hosted; and as hosts, they tended also to preside over worship, thus equating spiritual authority with material wealth. In some ways, the rise of orders of ministry helped to correct this.
But I think it’s a mistake to think there was ever a time when the church was pure and perfect. Even St. Paul’s early letters – some of the earliest Christian documents extant – show that there were problems within the first years of the church.
Perhaps we choose which problems we will have, but somehow we never seem to be able to choose to be without problems. Perhaps this says something about what it is to be human, before God?
Beautifully said. As for the problems? They thicken the plot, for starters.